Anti Ragging
Office of the Principal | Constitution of Anti-Ragging Committee 2020-2021
As laid down in clause 6(a) of AICTE regulations on curbing the menace of ragging in Higher Educational Institutions, an Anti-Ragging committee is constituted in AAMEC, Kovilvenni, Thiruvarur district.
Grievance Redressal Committee Members
Management Representative : Dr. S. N. Ramaswamy, Principal - Chair Person
University Member : Dr. S. Venkatesan, Professor, Department of Petrochemical Technology, UCE B I T campus, Tiruchirapalli.
DOTE Member : To be nominated by the Directorate of Technical Education
Faculty Member : Dr. V. Kalaivazhi, Associate Professor / IT
Grievances may include the following complaints of the aggrieved Students namely (As per AICTE Regulation)
1. Making admission contrary to merit determined in accordance with the declared admission policy of the institute.
2. Irregularity in the admission process adopted by the institute.
3. Refusing admission in accordance with the declared admission policy of the institute.
4. Withhold or refuse to return any document in the form of certificates of degree, diploma or any other award or other document deposited with it by a person for the purpose of seeking admission in such institution, with a view to induce or compel such person to pay any fee or fees in respect of any course or programme of study which such person does not intend to pursue.
5. Demand of money in excess of the specified in the declared admission policy or approved by the complaint authority to be charged by such institution.
6. Breach of policy for reservation in admission as may be applicable.
7. Complaints of alleged discrimination by students from Scheduled Tribes, OBC, women, minority or disabled categories.
8. Non-payment or delay in payment of scholarships to any students that such institution is committed, under the conditions imposed by AICTE, or by any other authority
9. Delay in conduct of Examinations or declaration of results beyond that specified in the academic calendar
10. On provision of student amenities as may have been promised or required to be provided by the institution.
11. Denial of quality education as promised at the time of admission or required to be provided.
12. Nontransparent of unfair evaluation practices.
13. Harassment and victimization of students including sexual harassment.
14. Refund of fees on withdrawal of admissions as per AICTE instructions from time to time.
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |